linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by check_readable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 May 2009 09:56:03 +0200
From:	Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, sandeen@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by check_readable_bytes()

At Fri, 15 May 2009 08:56:00 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 
> Can you describe how it makes it POSIX friendly?
> 
> My understanding was that EFAULT behaviour was undefined in POSIX.
> 
> The obvious hole in the patch is that all these checks are not race
> free -- they don't pin pages -- so if there's a parallel unmap even
> with your change they can still fail in the middle.


ptr = mmap(0, page_size, ....);
...
write(fd, ptr + page_size - 256, 512);

Write() will fail here, but it can write first 256 bytes. Previously,
all 512 bytes were proceeded, but last 256 bytes were zeroed, and
sys_write() returned 256. Not very nice too. 

-- 
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/