linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by check_readable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:38:38 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
	sandeen@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by check_readable_bytes()

> ptr = mmap(0, page_size, ....);
> ...
> write(fd, ptr + page_size - 256, 512);
> 
> Write() will fail here, but it can write first 256 bytes. Previously,
> all 512 bytes were proceeded, but last 256 bytes were zeroed, and
> sys_write() returned 256. Not very nice too. 

Is that really something that users rely on? It looks like a seriously
broken user program. Which one is that? (just that I can avoid it :)

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/