lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905151355.09888.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2009 13:55:08 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	hancockrwd@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, flar@...andria.com,
	schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	takata@...ux-m32r.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA

On Friday 15 May 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Don't know much history here but I don't wanna sprinkle ifdefs around
> in libata so I would much prefer dummy implementation which doesn't
> fail compile.

My original patch did that by adding 'depends on HAS_DMA'.

The only architectures that don't have that are m68k, m32r,
h8300, s390 and microblaze. More research has shown that
they all found a different way to disable the ATA drivers
already, except microblaze.

Alan, you objected the patch initially (and loudly), but
maybe you can reconsider this. The only actual effect
that my patch has is to allow an allyesconfig build on
microblaze and that will implement dma-mapping.h in the
next version.

All existing architectures do not care at all about this
change, unless I'm missing something.

Besides, all the other users of the DMA mapping API
also depend on CONFIG_HAS_DMA.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ