[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518110359.0da1e6a7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:03:59 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by
check_readable_bytes()
> On MMUless you wouldn't use page protection as a GC technique :-)
> Is EFAULT really optional on systems with page protection?
Yes.
It's also not guaranteed under Linux although pretty much all our I/O
paths do bother to report -EFAULT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists