[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518101614.GM16682@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:16:14 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Perform check in iov_iter_fault_in_readable() by check_readable_bytes()
> Is EFAULT really optional on systems with page protection?
It's de facto -- e.g. the x86-64 vsyscalls (getimeofday, time, clock_gettime,
getcpu) never implement it.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists