linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 11:11:09 +0300
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
 block/for-2.6.31 tree

On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch should be squashed into
>>     [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support
>>
>> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps
>> (all of them)
> 
> Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup
> patches) can't be pushed through the block tree.  It clearly currently
> doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ...
> 

If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I
guess?

It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ?

Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/