[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A13FD75.6050100@emulex.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:54:13 -0400
From: James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
block/for-2.6.31 tree
Fine by me.
-- james s
Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch should be squashed into
>>> [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support
>>>
>>> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps
>>> (all of them)
>>>
>> Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup
>> patches) can't be pushed through the block tree. It clearly currently
>> doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ...
>>
>>
>
> If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I
> guess?
>
> It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ?
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists