[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090520113918.GU11363@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:39:18 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] writeback: separate the flushing state/task from
the bdi
On Wed, May 20 2009, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 18-05-09 14:19:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Add a struct bdi_writeback for tracking and handling dirty IO. This
> > is in preparation for adding > 1 flusher task per bdi.
> Some changes (IMO the most complicated ones ;) in this patch set seem to
> be just reordering / cleanup of changes which happened in patch #2. Could
> you maybe move it there. Commented below...
Some of it, most of it is due to switching from one fixed thread to the
potential of having lots more. The moving code around is mostly due to
other callers now having to use functions that were below them, and I'd
rather move them around instead of having prototypes at the top.
It would be easy to unify the two patches, but I wanted to separate the
switch from pdflush to 1 bdi thread from the transition from 1 bdi
thread to several.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists