[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242821825.26820.583.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:17:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Could you explain that please? How does changing the top level
> cpuset affect other cpu sets?
Suppose you have 8 cpus and created 3 cpusets:
A: cpu0 - system administration stuff
B: cpu1-5 - generic computational stuff
C: cpu6-7 - latency critical stuff
Each such set is made a load-balance domain (iow load-balancing on the
top level set is disabled).
Now, suppose someone thinks its a good idea to remove cpu0 because the
machine is running against some thermal limit -- what will all the
administration stuff (including sshd) do?
Same goes for the latency critical stuff.
You really want to start shrinking the generic computational capacity
first.
The thing is, you cannot simply rip cpus out from under a system, people
might rely on them being there and have policy attached to them -- esp.
people touching cpusets should know that a machine isn't configured
homogeneous and any odd cpu will do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists