linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 15:13:01 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cpuset: add new API to change cpuset top group's cpus

Thanks for the explanation.

My naive reaction would be to fail if the socket to be taken out
is the only member of some cpuset. Or maybe break affinities in this case.

> You really want to start shrinking the generic computational capacity
> first.

One general issue to remember that if you don't react to the platform hint 
the platform will likely force a lower p-state on you to not exceed
the thermal limits, making everyone slower. 

(this will likely also not make your real time process happy)

So it's a bit more than a hint; it's more like a command "or else"

So it's a good idea to react or at least make at least a reasonable attempt 
to react.

> The thing is, you cannot simply rip cpus out from under a system, people
> might rely on them being there and have policy attached to them -- esp.
> people touching cpusets should know that a machine isn't configured
> homogeneous and any odd cpu will do.

Ok, so do you think it's possible to figure out based on the cpuset
graph / real time runqueue if a socket can be taken out? 

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/