[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090521004251.9160e228.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:42:51 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
block/for-2.6.31 tree
Hi James,
On Wed, 20 May 2009 14:37:20 +0000 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortuantely, I still need the block tree for-next to be rebased up to
> the current linus head because of a couple of conflicts:
>
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/hd.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/mg_disk.c
As discussed elsewhere, a merge of Linus' tree into the block tree will
fix this.
> So they obviously moved into linus head but wasn't taken out of block
> for-next.
Indeed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists