linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090521004553.6f544ad3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2009 00:45:53 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
 block/for-2.6.31 tree

Hi James,

On Wed, 20 May 2009 14:37:20 +0000 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> That would preserve the logical sequence of patches, yes.  However, Jens
> is a bit pressed for time, so I agreed to do this in SCSI.

That is entirely up to you and Jens as the maintainers.  Someone will
just need to fix up the conflicts during the merge window.

Given the conflict resolution patch sent to me by Boaz, I can cope in
linux-next for now.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped