linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1242830865.2881.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 14:47:45 +0000
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
	block/for-2.6.31 tree

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 00:42 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 2009 14:37:20 +0000 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortuantely, I still need the block tree for-next to be rebased up to
> > the current linus head because of a couple of conflicts:
> > 
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/hd.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/mg_disk.c
> 
> As discussed elsewhere, a merge of Linus' tree into the block tree will
> fix this.

Yes, I know, I was just adding urgency because scsi-misc has the two
conflicting commits in it, so it can't be merged into block for-next.

> > So they obviously moved into linus head but wasn't taken out of block
> > for-next.
> 
> Indeed.

OK, so I think your pulling of my posmerge tree can cope with the fact
that I did the necessary rebasing in block for-next before I made it the
base of my combined tree .... think of this as a nice test.

Just building now ... if it works, I'll push to SCSI post merge and all
our problems should go away.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/