[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1436D8.4050004@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:04 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for
block/for-2.6.31 tree
On 05/20/2009 07:43 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> If you actually just ask scsi-post-merge-2.6 where this line is, it will
> tell you:
>
> static void blk_finish_request(struct request *req, int error)
> {
> BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req));
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> if (blk_rq_tagged(req))
> blk_queue_end_tag(req->q, req);
>
> James
>
>
This is a new BUG_ON from:
block: implement and enforce request peek/start/fetch
It looks like there is one more sight of the old usage that
was not converted.
Tejun?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists