[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A155720.7050907@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:29:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix irqfd build failure discovered in linux-next
Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>> EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Ivirt/kvm -Iarch/x86/kvm
>>> +EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DKVM_HAVE_EVENTFD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The standard idiom for this is to use a Kconfig symbol; see for
>> example HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP in arch/*/kvm/Kconfig.
>>
>
> Ah, I didn't realize I could do this in such a contained manner. I was
> afraid of polluting the top level arch/Kconfig, which is why I went this
> other route. But I see from your example that this is not the case. I
> will make a v2 with this change.
>
Note the situation is not as good as it could be, as you have to
replicate the Kconfig for each arch. One day I'll set up
virt/kvm/Kconfig which will set up defaults, so archs can override them.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists