linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: fix irqfd build failure discovered in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:52:06 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: fix irqfd build failure discovered in linux-next

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell noted a build failure in arch != x86 in last nights
> linux-next tree, as noted here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/21/32
>
> This patch corrects the build issue by requiring explicit support for
> IRQFD to be defined, and only defining it on x86 (the only arch fully
> supported).  The code itself isnt architecture dependent, but we need
> to add a new file to each makefile, advertise the capability, and
> of course, test that it works for each supported arch.  We will submit
> patches against each relevant arch at a later time to enable support
> there as well.
>
>  
> +config HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
> +       bool
> +       default y
> +
>   

The build system will complain if it sees a symbol used but not defined; 
so you have to define it for all four archs.  So I went ahead and did 
virt/kvm/Kconfig and adapted your patch to use it.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/