[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242882567.3191.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:39:27 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10 -tip] x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power
Management
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 11:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >
> > I think better I will show with the coding to get the clear picture.
> >
> > Currently we are using hardcoded x86_capability as [0], [2], [4], [5].
> >
> > Thomas prefer to use constant so may be we can define current system as:
> >
> > enum {
> > CPUID_0000_0001_EDX = 0, /* 0x00000001 edx */
> > CPUID_8000_0001_EDX, /* 0x80000001 edx */
> > CPUID_8086_0001_EDX, /* 0x80860001 edx */
> > CPUID_SOFT_MISC1, /* Software Misc1 */
> > CPUID_0000_0001_ECX, /* 0x00000001 ecx */
> > CPUID_C000_0001_EDX, /* 0xC0000001 edx */
> > CPUID_8000_0001_ECX, /* 0x80000001 ecx */
> > CPUID_SOFT_MISC2, /* Software Misc2 */
> > CPUID_SOFT_VIRTUAL, /* Software Virtualization */
> > };
> >
>
> This really seems clumsy to me. We don't refer to the individual words
> all that often; and more importantly, I think it'd be hard to get rid of
> all the places where the words are referenced.
>
OK. It was thomas request. I hope this explanation will be enough and
thomas have no objection in Advanced Power Management's cpufeatures
series.
Ingo: should I resend new cpufeatures series, or you can use this one.
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists