[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090522163625.1e1dd8ce@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:36:25 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend4 3/3] itimers: simplify arm_timer() code a bit
On Fri, 22 May 2009 16:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > case CPUCLOCK_PROF:
> > - if (cputime_eq(p->cputime_expires.prof_exp,
> > - cputime_zero) ||
> > - cputime_gt(p->cputime_expires.prof_exp,
> > - nt->expires.cpu))
> > - p->cputime_expires.prof_exp =
> > - nt->expires.cpu;
> > + if (expires_le(p->cputime_expires.prof_exp,
> > + exp->cpu))
> > + break;
>
> Why the reverse logic and the extra break ?
Just to use helper and to make similar logic in all cases in this funcion.
Thanks
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists