[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090522192510.GB18651@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:25:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: do not create perf counter mlock sysctl
when CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=n
* Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
> Building tip from 82811bee3 without CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS results in:
>
> CC kernel/sysctl.o
> kernel/sysctl.c:928: error: 'sysctl_perf_counter_mlock' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> This is due to c5078f78b "perf_counter: provide an mlock threshold"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 44ebd90..c2a4467 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,7 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .child = slow_work_sysctls,
> },
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS
> {
> .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
> .procname = "perf_counter_mlock_kb",
> @@ -930,6 +931,7 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> },
> +#endif
> /*
> * NOTE: do not add new entries to this table unless you have read
> * Documentation/sysctl/ctl_unnumbered.txt
Hm, is this still needed? It doesnt apply here and i'm not seeing
build failures.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists