linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: do not create perf counter mlock sysctl when CONFIG_PERF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1243153516.26568.41.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2009 09:25:16 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: do not create perf counter mlock sysctl
 when CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=n

On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 15:25 -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Building tip from 82811bee3 without CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS results in:
> > 
> >   CC      kernel/sysctl.o
> > kernel/sysctl.c:928: error: 'sysctl_perf_counter_mlock' undeclared here (not in a function)

> Hm, is this still needed? It doesnt apply here and i'm not seeing 
> build failures.

Looks like I was using an obsolete branch, on current tip (790dc57b) it
was already fixed by the commit which added the first perf counter
sysctl in 1ccd1549.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/