[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905251537.35981.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:37:34 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, rth@...ddle.net, linux@....linux.org.uk,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org, starvik@...s.com,
jesper.nilsson@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, tony.luck@...el.com,
takata@...ux-m32r.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org, monstr@...str.eu,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jdike@...toit.com, chris@...kel.net,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
"linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] percpu: clean up percpu variable definitions
On Wed, 20 May 2009 05:07:35 pm Tejun Heo wrote:
> Percpu variable definition is about to be updated such that
>
> * percpu symbols must be unique even the static ones
>
> * in-function static definition is not allowed
That spluttering noise is be choking on the title of this patch :)
Making these pseudo statics is in no way a cleanup. How about we just
say "they can't be static" and do something like:
/* Sorry, can't be static: that breaks archs which need these weak. */
#define DEFINE_PER_CPU(type, var) \
extern typeof(type) var; DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists