[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905251615.08414.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:15:07 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
x86@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel.h: Add DO_ONCE statement expression macro
On Fri, 22 May 2009 08:30:22 am Joe Perches wrote:
> Add a DO_ONCE statement expression analogous to printk_once
> that executes any arbitrary statement exactly once.
>
> This will take the place of printk_once so that
> DO_ONCE(pr_<foo>) or any other statement performed
> a single time may be easily written.
If you're going to use a statement expression, was the intent to make
it usable for a test? If so, you want something vaguely like:
#define DO_ONCE(x...) ({ \
static bool __done = false; \
bool did = !__done; \
if (!__done) { \
x; \
__done = true; \
} \
did; \
})
Otherwise, why not just use a normal do {} while (0) ?
Anyway, statements in macros leave me uncomfortable. I prefer explicit
ONCE() macro which can be tested.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists