[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525104215.GA3191@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:42:15 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] scsi: unify allocation of scsi command and sense
buffer
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:33:42PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 1. If we have a machine with few type of hosts active each with it's own
> cmnd_slab we end up with many more slabs then today. Even though at the
> end they all happen to be of the same size. (With the pool reserves it
> can get big also).
Note that this should be optional. Device not having their own
per-command structure would continue using the global pools. Those
that have their own per-command structures already have their own pools
anyway.
> Hosts specify an size_of_private_command at host template, which might include
> the common-scsi_cmnd + sense_buffer + private_cmnd + optional scsi_ptr +
> bidi_data_buffer + ...
That sounds fine, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists