[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525104908.GV11363@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:49:08 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com,
david@...morbit.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] scsi: unify allocation of scsi command and sense
buffer
On Mon, May 25 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:33:42PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > 1. If we have a machine with few type of hosts active each with it's own
> > cmnd_slab we end up with many more slabs then today. Even though at the
> > end they all happen to be of the same size. (With the pool reserves it
> > can get big also).
>
> Note that this should be optional. Device not having their own
> per-command structure would continue using the global pools. Those
> that have their own per-command structures already have their own pools
> anyway.
The multiple pools of the same size "issue" can also easily be resolved
by having SCSI provide a way to setup/destroy these pools. Then it can
just reuse an existing pool, if it has the same size.
However, I doubt that this is really a real life issue that's worth
worrying about.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists