linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1243294366.29222.10.camel@johannes.local>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 01:32:46 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@...il.com>
Cc:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org,
	mickflemm@...il.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:

> +       err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> +       if (err) {
> +               sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> +               return -1;
> +       }

Missing rfkill_free, and why -EPERM? Could you try to work against v11
of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)