lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525060531.GA16990@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2009 08:05:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: kvm/paging_tmpl.h intialize the variable
	before using it


* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:

> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>> May be in some cases paging64_fetch() and paging32_fetch() will return sptep
>> without initialization.
>>
>> Also fixes compilation warning:
>>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/io_delay.o
>>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h: In function ‘paging64_fetch’:
>>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h:279: warning: ‘sptep’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h: In function ‘paging32_fetch’:
>>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h:279: warning: ‘sptep’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
>> index 6bd7020..99cb10d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
>> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
>>  {
>>  	unsigned access = gw->pt_access;
>>  	struct kvm_mmu_page *shadow_page;
>> -	u64 spte, *sptep;
>> +	u64 spte, *sptep = NULL;
>>  	int direct;
>>  	gfn_t table_gfn;
>>  	int r;
>>   
>
> It's a false alarm.  Isn't there a macro to shut up the warning?

there's uninitialized_var(), but that will shut up the warning and 
any _correct_ future warning - so it's dangerous. Initialize it to 
NULL and be done with it? We dont want stray warnings in the kernel.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ