linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15 seconds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A1C06D7.8080000@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 10:12:23 -0500
From:	Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15
 seconds


Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, john stultz wrote:
>> Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
>>
>> This looks great to me!
>>
>> Thanks for putting up with my nit-picky review and revised suggestions!
>>
>> Thomas, you ok to pick this up?
> 
> Yup, will do.

Hi Thomas, John,

Would you also be willing to accept the initial patch that I submitted?

See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124026224019895&w=2

If so, I could resubmit the two patches as a patch series called 
something like "dynamic tick: enabling longer sleep times on 32-bit 
machines."

Let me know your thoughts. I will also also add a changelog too.

Cheers
Jon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/