linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15 seconds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 13:26:37 -0700
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep
 formorethan2.15 seconds

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:12 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 May 2009, john stultz wrote:
> >> Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
> >>
> >> This looks great to me!
> >>
> >> Thanks for putting up with my nit-picky review and revised suggestions!
> >>
> >> Thomas, you ok to pick this up?
> > 
> > Yup, will do.
> 
> Hi Thomas, John,
> 
> Would you also be willing to accept the initial patch that I submitted?
> 
> See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124026224019895&w=2
> 
> If so, I could resubmit the two patches as a patch series called 
> something like "dynamic tick: enabling longer sleep times on 32-bit 
> machines."
> 
> Let me know your thoughts. I will also also add a changelog too.

Yea, I think both of them look good. So I'd resend as a patch set with
proper patch descriptions on both.

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/