| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1243369597.3275.8.camel@localhost> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:26:37 -0700 From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15 seconds On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:12 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2009, john stultz wrote: > >> Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> > >> > >> This looks great to me! > >> > >> Thanks for putting up with my nit-picky review and revised suggestions! > >> > >> Thomas, you ok to pick this up? > > > > Yup, will do. > > Hi Thomas, John, > > Would you also be willing to accept the initial patch that I submitted? > > See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124026224019895&w=2 > > If so, I could resubmit the two patches as a patch series called > something like "dynamic tick: enabling longer sleep times on 32-bit > machines." > > Let me know your thoughts. I will also also add a changelog too. Yea, I think both of them look good. So I'd resend as a patch set with proper patch descriptions on both. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists