[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090526211306.GA7065@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:13:06 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Q: do_notify_parent/do_notify_parent_cldstop && info.si_xtime
do_notify_parent() reports .si_Xtime = tsk->Xtime + signal->Xtime,
but do_notify_parent_cldstop() uses .si_Xtime = tsk->Xtime.
Is this right?
Yes, tsk->Xtime + signal->Xtime does not make much sense for
do_notify_parent_cldstop(), but reporting group_leader->Xtime
(if not traced) doesn't look very right too. IOW, perhaps we
need thread_group_cputime() here?
Ole.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists