[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090526141552.507f8821.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:15:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devres: WARN() and return, don't crash on device_del()
of uninitialized device
On Mon, 25 May 2009 16:53:31 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> I just debugged an obscure crash caused by a device_del() of a all NULL'd
> out struct device (in usb-serial) and found that a patch like this one would
> have saved me time (in addition to improved chances of a bug report from
> users hitting similar driver bugs).
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/base/devres.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-work.orig/drivers/base/devres.c 2009-05-25 16:43:46.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/drivers/base/devres.c 2009-05-25 16:46:36.000000000 +1000
> @@ -428,6 +428,11 @@ int devres_release_all(struct device *de
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + /* Looks like an uninitialized device structure */
> + if (dev->devres_head.next == NULL) {
> + WARN(1);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->devres_lock, flags);
> return release_nodes(dev, dev->devres_head.next, &dev->devres_head,
> flags);
This could be coded a little more neatly as:
/* Looks like an uninitialized device structure */
if (WARN_ON(dev->devres_head.next == NULL))
return -ENODEV;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists