[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090526231444.GA23602@hallyn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:14:44 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:44AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Honestly, I have great respect for your coding abilities. And if 'voices
> > from on high' tell us to base upon your code, I'd be fine with that, I
> > have no real problems with what I see on yet another cursory look. But
> > given the amount of collective time that's been spent developing, reviewing,
> > and testing Oren's set, it wouldn't make any sense to just jump. So
> > I'd still just like to know how you see this proceeding.
>
> Yes, please, someone decide on "checkpoint semi-live container" issue.
Well, *I* for one did decide :) I decided that checkpointing a semi-live
container will not bother the kernel, and so the user gets to decide by
passing a flag into sys_checkpoint() whether he is ok with a checkpoint
if the container was semi-live.
BTW - it looks like your ISP is causing your emails to be flagged as
spam by several servers? Several people don't seem to be receiving
your patchsets.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists