linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090527122540.6897.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 12:26:38 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev

> >> >The numbers look too small for a 7 disk RAID:
> >> >
> >> >        > #dd if=testdir/testfile of=/dev/null bs=16384
> >> >        >
> >> >        > -2.6.30-rc6
> >> >        > 1048576+0 records in
> >> >        > 1048576+0 records out
> >> >        > 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 224.182 seconds, 76.6 MB/s
> >> >        >
> >> >        > -2.6.30-rc6-patched
> >> >        > 1048576+0 records in
> >> >        > 1048576+0 records out
> >> >        > 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 206.465 seconds, 83.2 MB/s
> >> >
> >> >I'd suggest you to configure the array properly before coming back to
> >> >measuring the impact of this patch.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I created 16GB file to this disk array, and mounted to testdir, dd to 
> >this directory.
> >
> >I mean, you should get >300MB/s throughput with 7 disks, and you
> >should seek ways to achieve that before testing out this patch :-)
> 
> Throughput number of storage array is very from one product to another.
> On my hardware environment I think this number is valid and
> my patch is effective.

Hifumi-san, if you really want to merge, you should reproduce this
issue on typical hardware, I think.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/