linux-kernel - One question about perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 15:17:36 +0800
From:	Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: One question about perf_counter on IA

I noticed that the LVT error register is masked and then unmasked during
perf_counter initialization on IA in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c

void perf_counters_lapic_init(int nmi)
{
	u32 apic_val;

	if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
		return;

	/*
	 * Enable the performance counter vector in the APIC LVT:
	 */
	apic_val = apic_read(APIC_LVTERR);

	apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, apic_val | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
	if (nmi)
		apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
	else
		apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, LOCAL_PERF_VECTOR);
	apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, apic_val);
}

Why is this needed? Is this documented somewhere in the spec? I tried
commenting out the masking and unmasking operations and I did not any
error interrupt generated.

Thanks
-Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/