[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0F5B06BAB751E047AB5C87D1F77A7788694630BB17@GVW0547EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:18:58 +0000
From: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <Mike.Miller@...com>
To: "Owens, James" <JOwens@...com>
CC: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk" <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: RE: Analyzed/Solved/Bisected: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owens, James
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:13 PM
> To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch; Matthew Wilcox; Andrew Morton; Mike
> Galbraith; viro@...IV.linux.org.uk; rjw@...k.pl;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk;
> Kay Sievers; shemminger@...tta.com; Jesse Barnes
> Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved/Bisected: Booting
> 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
>
> Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
> >>> Finally, today I built the ccsii driver into the kernel.
> >> It was previously modularized and loaded from initrd. The second
> >> "sysfs" line went away. But does this make cciss guilty? It is now
> >> loaded about 2 seconds earlier in the boot sequence, which
> is a big
> >> change in timing I guess.
> >>> Enlighten me :-)
> >> No idea what is going on, but since I saw your May 20
> message, I have
> >> been trying to wake up someone whose day job it should be to care
> >> about dl380s and smartarrays. :)
> >
> > What? I know Martin has pinged me in the past, but I do not
> think it was about this issue. If there's multiple sysfs
> entries for cciss I can't explain that offhand. We do little
> to nothing for sysfs in the driver.
> > Had something similiar happen recently where "/" changed to
> "!". Had do to with our nested directory structure,
> /dev/cciss/name vs /dev/name. But we did not make that change, either.
>
> It was not you that I was trying to get to look at this...
> but now that I have your attention :)
>
> I did not think it pointed at cciss or the sysfs entry as
> being the problem. I was wondering more about platform probe
> timing, the bios, and how each card firmware reacts given
> what I thought the patch did. I could be totally wrong about
> that as I work at the filesystem level.
>
> We have not seen the problem yet but we have different
> proliants/smartarrays.
>
> If you can try it on matching hardware, great, if not then
> someone will eventually find a system to test it.
>
Sorry, I don't have any hw that old. We're very limited on space these days.
-- mikem--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists