[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905262210350.21274-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in usb-serial with keyspan adapter on current upstream
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:06 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Well, both our patches are bogus in the sense that they will leak
> > > the stuff in the port structure.
> >
> > That's not true at all. Take a look at the destroy_serial() routine.
>
> Right... hrm. This is an horrible mess, I can't wait to see that
> refcount going wrong and things trying to double free or leaking the
> structure.
>
> Oh well, fix it the way your want, I don't care as long as it's fixed.
> This driver is just plain horrible.
I can't disagree with that. :-) The usb-serial design was a mess to
begin with, and it didn't get much better when the serial bus was
introduced.
I'm inclined to use my patch because it's shortest. Can I add your
"Tested-by:"?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists