[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905281236490.17705@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [my_cpu_ptr 1/5] Introduce my_cpu_ptr()
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:16:01PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 May 2009 03:16:59 am cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > my_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
> >
> > I had this implemented earlier as as get_cpu_ptr()/__get_cpu_ptr(), to match
> > get_cpu_var() / __get_cpu_var().
> >
> > But other than that nomenclature quibble, it looks fine!
>
> my_ seems a very odd naming. We have a lot of this_cpu naming for the
> current cpu i nthe ctree, so I would suggest sticking to that.
So this_cpu is taken. I used THIS_CPU in earlier version
but got complaints about uppercase use. Is
this_cpu_ptr()
and
__this_cpu_ptr()
ok?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists