[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090528164011.GA30104@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 01:40:11 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Support current clocksource handling in fallback sched_clock().
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 06:32:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 09:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > CPU0 CPU1
> > >
> > > clock = ACCESS_ONCE(sched_clocksource);
> > >
> > > unload module
> > > clocksource_unregister()
> > > sched_clocksource = jiffies
> > > unmap data/text
> > >
> > > cyc2ns(clock, clocksource_read(clock)) <--- fireworks
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Do any module based clocksources even exist right now?
> > clocksource_unregister only seems to be used 3 times..
>
> Good point, it appears its not even exported.
>
> Thomas mentioned modules, I assumed.
>
The drivers/clocksource/ drivers in theory could be modular anyways.
Handling this transition properly is at least one less barrier to modular
clocksources, so I think it's progress regardless. I don't remember what
all of the other issues were though, John probably remembers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists