linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29.4: hibernation fails with large kernel trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090528204802.GE11477@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 22:48:02 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, niel.lambrechts@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: 2.6.29.4: hibernation fails with large kernel trace

On Thu 2009-05-28 17:06:37, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > In the meantime, people should stop/restart fuse around
> > suspend/hibernation, I guess...
> 
> Which is not possible if the filesystem is busy, and it _will_ be busy
> in all cases where we now see freeze failures.

Well, maybe people will need to kill few processes to get it to
suspend :-(.

> And just a reminder that this problem is not fuse specific: similar
> freeze failures can also happen for network filesystems routed over a
> tun/tap device (e.g. NFS over OpenVPN).

Agreed, general solution would be nice. In NFS over OpenVPN case,
people will need to unmount NFS :-(, and maybe kill processes to do
that.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/