[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1M9hBl-0004dv-KT@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:06:37 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: pavel@....cz
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
niel.lambrechts@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: 2.6.29.4: hibernation fails with large kernel trace
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> In the meantime, people should stop/restart fuse around
> suspend/hibernation, I guess...
Which is not possible if the filesystem is busy, and it _will_ be busy
in all cases where we now see freeze failures.
And just a reminder that this problem is not fuse specific: similar
freeze failures can also happen for network filesystems routed over a
tun/tap device (e.g. NFS over OpenVPN).
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists