lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 30 May 2009 12:23:43 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	lkml@...ethan.org
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Suresh Siddha" 
	<suresh.siddha@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallapadi <venkatesh.pallapadi@...el.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 2.6.30-rc8

Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Sat May 30 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> @@ -1535,6 +1535,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
>>>  			register save and restore. The kernel will only save
>>>  			legacy floating-point registers on task switch.
>>>  
>>> +	noxsave		[BUGS=X86] Disables x86 extended register state save
>>> +			and restore using xsave. The kernel will fallback to
>>> +			enabling legacy floating-point and sse state.
>>> +
>> Does that mean apps using sse8 will see their registers corrupted if
>> this option is used? Or are new registers sets always added in a way
>> that kernel has to enable them first?

New register sets always require enabling.

> Has this change been tested on the processors that have independent ftp&sse
> units, without the shared registers?  Such as the VIA C7-M?

x87 and SSE are always separate.  Whether or not register sets are
separate is an architectural issue, and isn't subject to variation
across CPUs.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ