[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090531080304.6e195c14@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:03:04 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Larry H." <research@...reption.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page
allocator
On Sun, 31 May 2009 07:38:26 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Really, get a life, go fix real bugs. Don't make our kernel slower
>
> the "make it slower" is an assumption on your part.
> I'm not convinced. Would like to see data!
>
btw if the performance difference is basically a wash (as I'm
suspecting), then we SHOULD do zero-on-free, just out of general
principles.
Ingo mentioned the kernel stack, and that's a good point, we ought
to have a way to zero the rest of the stack inside the kernel, at
which point you could do things like providing a command line option
(or sysctl?) to call that from the munmap codepath or so...
(after all there you do a tlb flush and other expensive things as well)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists