linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1243782861.6592.415.camel@desktop>
Date:	Sun, 31 May 2009 08:14:21 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To:	tom.leiming@...il.com
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage_*wards by BFS

On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 22:49 +0800, tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
> -static inline int __bfs_forward(struct lock_list *src_entry,
> +static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,

Your patchset seems a bit young still .. For instance, adding an "s" in
the above line, that's just flux that really shouldn't be there.. I was
reviewing your patches but I stopped because it just looks like you need
to organize them better. I wonder for one, if they bisect or if they
pass checkpatch .. Your code also seems to have a lot of other little
cleanup type issues..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/