linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Use kzfree in tty buffer management to enforce data sanitization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905301902530.3435@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 30 May 2009 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Larry H." <research@...reption.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use kzfree in tty buffer management to enforce data
 sanitization



On Sat, 30 May 2009, Larry H. wrote:
>
> This patch doesn't affect fastpaths.

This patch is ugly as hell.

You already know the size of the data to clear.

If we actually wanted this (and I am in _no_way_ saying we do), the only 
sane thing to do is to just do

	memset(buf->data, 0, N_TTY_BUF_SIZE);
	if (PAGE_SIZE != N_TTY_BUF_SIZE)
		kfree(...)
	else
		free_page(...)


but quite frankly, I'm not convinced about these patches at all.

I'm also not in the least convinced about how you just dismiss everybodys 
concerns.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/