[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f73f7ab80905301829j45723fd6j6e04904c8214e3b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:29:56 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, paulus@...ba.org, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index f430e15..b0ee851 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -158,6 +158,17 @@ config ARCH_MTD_XIP
>> config GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
>> def_bool y
>>
>> +config OF
>> + def_bool y
>> +
>> +config PROC_DEVICETREE
>> + bool "Support for device tree in /proc"
>
> It certainly should not be in /proc.
There is unfortunately a relatively large legacy base of existing
tools which depend on the device-tree (specifically, the
representation of the OF device tree that the kernel generates at
boot-time) present in proc, especially on platforms (PowerPC/Sparc)
which have a real OpenFirmware implementation.
On the other hand, since this is a new port, we can just assume that
(for this port) we're going to fix the tools to use a different path.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists