| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.1.10.0906010941170.656@jbrandeb-MOBL1.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:48:18 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 2.6.30rc7: ksoftirqd CPU saturation (x86-64 only, not x86-32) (e1000e-related?) On Sun, 31 May 2009, Nix wrote: > I've just compiled a 64-bit kernel for a couple of quad-core Nehalems > (one L5520, one Core i7) for the first time. Both were using 32-bit > kernels happily before, and one (the Core i7) is happy afterwards: but > the other sees two ksoftirqd threads saturating the CPU (well, half of > it, this being a 4-core box). <snip> > So, not particularly informative. > > CPUs 3 and 5 seem to be receiving the lion's share of the local timer > interrupts and networking interrupts (this box has twin e1000es): > > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 > 0: 33 0 0 2377 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer > 1: 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > 3: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge > 4: 0 0 0 372 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge serial > 8: 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0 > 12: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > 16: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3 > 18: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb8 > 19: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb5, uhci_hcd:usb7 > 20: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi > 21: 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, firewire_ohci > 22: 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel > 23: 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb6 > 39: 0 0 22405 0 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi arcmsr > 48: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DMAR_MSI-edge dmar0 > 56: 0 0 0 3961 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci > 57: 0 0 0 7654 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge gordianet-rx-0 > 58: 0 0 0 0 8065 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge gordianet-tx-0 > 59: 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge gordianet > 60: 0 0 0 0 0 3576 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge fastnet-rx-0 > 61: 0 0 0 0 0 2555 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge fastnet-tx-0 > 62: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 PCI-MSI-edge fastnet where is the e1000e interrupt here? I was expecting to see eth0/eth1 > NMI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts > LOC: 8437 2263 6528 60480 13987 113384 16365 57641 Local timer interrupts > SPU: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts > RES: 3790 55 6780 18 2370 115 893 161 Rescheduling interrupts > CAL: 83 176 144 155 174 179 173 169 Function call interrupts > TLB: 125 9 138 4 282 22 310 22 TLB shootdowns > TRM: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thermal event interrupts > THR: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > I'd not expect that level of e1000e interrupt activity to flood the > ksoftirqds like this, and in 32-bit mode it doesn't. > > So, anyone know what's going on, or how I could find out? when you went into 64 bit mode your kernel enabled the IOMMU/DMAR, which means that map/unmap cycles are taking many more cycles per packet, accounting for the increased CPU utilization. you can disable at boot with intel_iommu=off to see if it goes back to previous behavior. There is no DMAR/IOMMU in 32 bit mode, AFAIK. Hope this helps, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists