| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87hbyzzs36.fsf_-_@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:12:13 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.30rc7: ksoftirqd CPU saturation (x86-64 and x86-32 both) (in-tree e1000e at fault)
On 1 Jun 2009, David Miller uttered the following:
> From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:16:26 +0100
>
>> I plan to try out 2.6.29 (and back to 2.6.25 or thereabouts) tomorrow
>> and see if it ever worked: if it did I'll bisect for it (rendered tricky
>> by the out-of-tree e1000e driver, but doable: it would be easier if I
>> had a clue where the e1000-devel git tree is, if anywhere, but I still
>> have no idea despite considerable searching).
>
> Why are you using the out-of-tree e1000e driver? What's wrong
> with the one in the tree? :-)
My original speculations were wrong: it goes wrong with 32-bit as well
as 64-bit kernels. The key is that it only ever goes wrong with the
in-tree driver. When I compiled the faulty kernels (32- and 64-bit), I
forgot to copy the out-of-tree driver into place. Use the out-of-tree
driver, and the CPU hogging goes away. So this is an in-tree e1000e
driver bug, definitely. The card is an 82574L.
I could bisect for it, but I have no real evidence that the in-tree
driver *ever* worked with this card. When the machine came from the
vendor it was running 2.6.25... and the out-of-tree driver.
I'll hunt backwards a bit and see if it works in 2.6.28 or something
like that. Maybe I'll be lucky.
--- out-of-tree driver with this patch needed to compile, previously
posted to e1000-devel without comment from anyone: probably the upstream
git tree, wherever that is, already has it:
diff -u e1000e-0.5.18.3/src/kcompat.h drivers/net/e1000e/kcompat.h
--- e1000e-0.5.18.3/src/kcompat.h 2009-03-05 18:43:14.000000000 +0000
+++ drivers/net/e1000e/kcompat.h 2009-05-21 23:46:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -141,12 +141,6 @@
#endif
#endif
-#ifndef IRQ_HANDLED
-#define irqreturn_t void
-#define IRQ_HANDLED
-#define IRQ_NONE
-#endif
-
#ifndef SET_NETDEV_DEV
#define SET_NETDEV_DEV(net, pdev)
#endif
@@ -1650,4 +1644,12 @@
#define pci_request_selected_regions_exclusive(pdev, bars, name) \
pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, bars, name)
#endif /* < 2.6.29 */
+/*****************************************************************************/
+#if ( LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,30) )
+#ifndef IRQ_HANDLED
+#define irqreturn_t void
+#define IRQ_HANDLED
+#define IRQ_NONE
+#endif
+#endif /* < 2.6.30 */
#endif /* _KCOMPAT_H_ */
diff -u e1000e-0.5.18.3/src/kcompat_ethtool.c drivers/net/e1000e/kcompat_ethtool.c
--- e1000e-0.5.18.3/src/kcompat_ethtool.c 2009-03-05 18:43:14.000000000 +0000
+++ drivers/net/e1000e/kcompat_ethtool.c 2009-05-20 21:28:02.000000000 +0100
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
#include <linux/ethtool.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include "kcompat.h"
@@ -782,7 +783,7 @@
#define ETHTOOL_OPS_COMPAT
int ethtool_ioctl(struct ifreq *ifr)
{
- struct net_device *dev = __dev_get_by_name(ifr->ifr_name);
+ struct net_device *dev = __dev_get_by_name(&init_net, ifr->ifr_name);
void *useraddr = (void *) ifr->ifr_data;
u32 ethcmd;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists