linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090602232108.GG7917@plum>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:21:09 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot
	even when ignore_ppc=0

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:12:19PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:13:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > thanks - i've applied this and started testing it. I suspect 1-2 
> > > days of test-time should be enough to see if it breaks this box in 
> > > any way.
> > 
> > My recollection was that you'd see the machine limited to 1GHz on every 
> > boot?
> 
> That seems accurate based on my reading of the old thread.
> 
> It's been a couple of weeks; has anyone seen any problems?

Now it's been thirty days since I last heard from anyone.  Has the problem been
fixed by some other means?

--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/