linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fuse: cache invalidation calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1MC9MC-0004nV-Ri@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:35:32 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	csaba@...ster.com
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, avati@...ster.com, muirj@...tel.com,
	fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dl-hacking@...ster.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: cache invalidation calls

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Csaba Henk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Anand Avati wrote:
> >> I was wondering how the userland libfuse would be made aware of the
> >> presence of these two notification features?
> >
> > Here's a patch against fuse CVS.  It's also from John Muir.
> 
> In fact, what we were meditating about is the lack of the
> FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION bump. Without that, how do the two parties
> negotiate if the rev inval messages are understood? One of John's
> patches in his patchset had it bumped though...

Yes, I removed that intentionally as hopefully this will go in 2.6.31
with the other 10 -> 11 API changes.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/