| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <100d90a90906040232ofd2b5ebw8c8d5f677b13e840@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:32:32 +0200 From: Csaba Henk <csaba@...ster.com> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> Cc: avati@...ster.com, muirj@...tel.com, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dl-hacking@...ster.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: cache invalidation calls On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Anand Avati wrote: >> I was wondering how the userland libfuse would be made aware of the >> presence of these two notification features? > > Here's a patch against fuse CVS. It's also from John Muir. In fact, what we were meditating about is the lack of the FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION bump. Without that, how do the two parties negotiate if the rev inval messages are understood? One of John's patches in his patchset had it bumped though... Csaba -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists