[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A27C2BF.3090108@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:49:03 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: ying.huang@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] KVM: Add VT-x machine check support
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> This assumption is incorrect. This code is executed after preemption
>> has been enabled, and we may have even slept before reaching it.
>>
>
> The only thing that counts here is the context before the machine
> check event. If there was a vmexit we know it was in guest context.
>
> The only requirement we have is that we're running still on the same
> CPU. I assume that's true, otherwise the vmcb accesses wouldn't work?
>
It's not true, we're in preemptible context and may have even slept.
vmcs access work because we have a preempt notifier called when we are
scheduled in, and will execute vmclear/vmptrld as necessary. Look at
kvm_preempt_ops in virt/kvm_main.c.
>> We get both an explicit EXIT_REASON and an exception?
>>
>
> These are different cases. The exception is #MC in guest context,
> the EXIT_REASON is when a #MC happens while the CPU is executing
> the VM entry microcode.
>
I see, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists